Pages

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Imam Mehdi: A FALSE PROPHECY - Not Mentioned In The Holy Quran


187/7. They ask you about the Hour (Day of Resurrection): "When will be its appointed time?" Say: "The knowledge thereof is only with my Lord. None can reveal its time but He. Heavy is its burden through the heavens and the earth. It shall not come upon you except all of a sudden." They ask you as if you have a good knowledge of it. Say: "The knowledge thereof is only with Allah but most of mankind not believe."

188/7. Say (O Muhammad ): "I possess no power of benefit or hurt to myself except as AllĮբh wills. If I had the knowledge of the Ghaib (unseen), I should have secured for myself an abundance of wealth, and no evil should have touched me. I am but a warner, and a bringer of glad tidings unto people who believe."

77/16. And to Allah belongs the unseen of the heavens and the earth. And the matter of the Hour is not but as a twinkling of the eye, or even nearer. Truly! Allah is Able to do all things.

About Sahi Hadith or any other Hadith, you may check with him or any one else, but as far as Quran is concerned He is right? you accept it or reject it, is your choice. Ummah Got so many things which are not mentioned in Quran from other religions, such as name of the lady was Zuleikha who was in love with Yousuf, then name of Kizhar whereas in Quran it is said He was just an abad(slave), etc etc. etc. etc. Now you check with the source yourself. For me it is enough that there was a lady, I am not interested in her name, for me it is enough that there was a human being gifted knowledge by Allah, I am not interested to know his name because Allah has not mentioned it. that is enough. You see the difference.

Imam Mehdi (ie the 12th imam) Dont believe in as its not in the quran it is very persude in the Shiite faith but remeber the Quran is what makes a muslim not Haddiths and in the Quran EXPLICITLY it clearly mentions to all muslims not to split up the religions into sects according to believes either through Haddiths or political reasons or any reason for that matter, there is no such thing as shiite, sunni or any other muslim there is only islam and its practisers are ‘muslims’ the dajjal is mentioned in very many haddiths again it is not in the Quran and for good reason. Haddiths practise Sunnah according to MAN they are not divine scripure like The Holy Quran. The Quran is a flawless book whos name is being corrupted by bad practise and false beliefs.

The Qur’an is undoubtedly first and foremost.

See the pages of Quran for yourself and see if you can find a single word on Dajjal and Imam Mehdi from the Quran. It’s all from the man-written Hadith.

Dajjal & Imam Mehdi story commonly accepted by both Sunnis and Shiias.

The concept that one day Imam Mahdi will come and fight against "Dejaal" is not only a very popular concept (especially in Asia) but got it as the part of "Aimaan". Though Quran has not any evidence about but people have made this concept a big part of their religious life.

First of all, the topic going to discuss here is not the matter of DEEN (part of Aimaan) and secondly keep in mind that every religious community has this concept. All the communities had been waiting for some one that will come and fill the land with justice. Christen, Jews, Hindus, Muslim even other small communities all are waiting for some one. Why they all are waiting for some one? The reason is, the same thinking that every nation has "some one will come and their nation will rule the world"

Being a Muslim we are also waiting but with a little change, that we are waiting for two persons instead of one, "Hazrat Eesah and Imam Mahdi". Although Quran has not any indication of these things but unfortunately the concept has been made our "Aiman". The base of Imam Mahdi concept is about 21 Ahadith in "Tirmazi, Abu Dawood, Ibn-a-Maaja" and some in other lower category books of Ahadith.

The concept relate to "Hazrat Eesah" is typically christens concept and Muslim got it from there, make a little change and adopt. The concept relates to "Imam Mahdi" is typically "shiyaa" concept, a null and bud story.

Mohammad bin Hasan Askari bin Ali naqi bin Mohammad Taqi bin Ali Raza bin Moosa kazim bin Jafar Sadiq bin Mohammad Baqir bin Ali (zain ul aabadin) bin Husain bin Ali (rt), said birth 255 hijri and death????????? The 12th Imam of shiyaas called Imam Mahdi that was disappeared in a cage named "serman raa" when He was 6 year old and, according to the story, will appear at the time of "Dejaal", will fight against, defeat him and fill the land in justice.

In early era of Islam Muslim community had the different thinking about coming Imam Mahdi & Maseh (as) a group believed and others not.

Ibn-a-Hazam (5th hijri) said

When an "ummat" degraded by its own vulgar and ill-mannered way of life
waits for its good time and make itself satisfied that some one will come and
they would get the better position again. So the "Eesai" has the concept of becoming Hazat Eesah and "shiyaas" are waiting for their 12th imam called Imam Mahdi.

(Al malal o al nahal)

It means at that time only Shiyaa had the concept that Imam Mahdi will come one day, but with the passage of time it is penetrated in all Muslims. And about Maseh Ibn-a-Hazam said

There is no prophet after Mohammad (pbuh) and about Maseh (rt)
Muslims have different opinion i.e. will He come or not?

(marati'bul ajmah)

Allama Iqbal said

As I think the concept of Mahdi, Maseh and Mujaddad is completely Iranian and "Ajmi" perception. This concept has not any link with Quran, Islam and Arabic perceptions.

(Iqbal Nama part 2, Tashkeel-a-jadeed alahiyaat-a-islam, Traitors of islam)

Quran do not provide any positive or negative evidence for this perception, only Ahadith point out this concept so I come to the topic related Ahadith. As I calculated all, nearly, the "Ravees" of topic related Ahadith had criticized by knowledge full persons (Muhaddaseen) like Ibn-a-Hajar, Hafiz Zahbee etc, the text of Ahadith is too complex, most of the Ahadith are incomplete, and secondly it is common thinking that this event will be happened near judgment day but all these Ahadith do not indicate such things (even in a single hadith) I am surprising where from the muslims got it as sign of judgment day.


In Tirmazi (4 ahadith)

1 - Abaid bin asbaat koofi, Asbaat bin mohammd koofi, Sufiyaan soori koofi,
Asim bin bahdilla koofi, Zer bin jaish koofi, Abdullah bin masood (rt)
Mohammad (saw) said Humanity will not be end up-till the caliph ship is not come to a man from Arab having my name.

2 - Abdul jabbar bin allab basri, Sufiyaan soori koofi, Asim bin bahdilla
koofi, Zer bin jaish koofi, Abdullah bin masood (rt)
Mohammad (saw) said there would be a man from my "ahl-a-bait" having my name.

3 - Asim bin bahdillah koofi, Abu salah al samaan, Abu Huraira (rt)
If there would be remaining one day in judgment the day will be prolonged up till he become caliph.

4 - Mohd. bin bashaar basri, Mohd. bin jafar ghunder basri, Shouba al wasti
basri, Zaid bin umi khwari basri, Abu siddiq naji, Saeed khadri (rt)
Mohammad (saw) said there would be a Mahdi in my ummat rule 5 or 7 or 9 year, one come to him and said give me some thing and he will give him beyond ordinary.

A brief description about "Ravees"

Asim bin bahdillah (died 128 hijri)
He was not hafiz-a-hadith, not true, has not good memory, put wrong Ahadith.
Ibn-a-kharash & Abu Hatim said He put wrong Ahadith.

(Tahzeeb ul Tahzeed by Ibn-a-Hajar)
He could not be accepted in hadith.
(kaamil by ibn-a-addi, meezan ul ai'tadaal by zahbee)

Zaid bin umi bin khwari
He was not good (ibn-a-hajar) Abu hatim said put wrong Ahadith and not able to called "siqqa", Ibn-a-saad said "za'eef ul hadith, ibn ul madni said za'eef ul hadith, Ajli said he is nothing, Ibn-a-anse said he put wrong Ahadith and use the name of hazrat ans (rt).

(Tahzeeb ul Tahzeeb by Ibn-a-hajar & May'zaan by Zahbee)

In Abu Dawood (10 Ahadith)

1 - This hadith has five "Tahvelaat" but all are end upon Asim bin bahdillah koofi.

I_ sufiaan suri, asim bahdilla, zer bin jaish, Abdullah bin masood(rt)
II_ umer bin abaidullah, asim bahdilla, zer bin jaish, Abdullah bin masood(rt)
III_ abu baker bin eyaash, asim bahdilla, zer bin jaish, Abdullah bin masood(rt)
If there would be even one day in judgment, Allah will appear a man from my ahl-a-bait or me will rule at Arab, he will be my namesake and his father will be my father's namesake.

IV_ za'aid bin abi riqaad bahli, asim bahdilla, zer bin jaish, Abdullah bin masood(rt)
V_ fater bin khalifa kofi, asim bahdilla, zer bin jaish, Abdullah bin masood(rt)
Added, that person will fill the land with justice as it was filled with injustice.

2 - Usman bin abi sheeba koofi, Fazal bin wakee koofi, Fater bin khalifa koofi, Qasim bin abi buza hamdani, Abu tufail, Ali (rt)
If there would be even one day in judgment Allah will sent a man from my ahl-a-bait that will fill the land with justice as it was filled with injustice.

3 - Ahmed bin ibrahim baghdadi, Abdullah bin jafer riqi, Hasan bin umer riqi, Ziyaad bin biyaan riqi, Ali bin nafeel khurani, Saeed bin museeb, (ummul mo'hmaineen) umay salma (rt),
Mohammad (saw) said Mahdi would be my progeny from Fatima. (zahbi says in maizaan ul ait'daal this hadith is not right)

(Ibn-a-hajar said there is nothing that could strong this hadith, its single from Ali bin nafeel so could not be accepted.) Tahzeeb ul tahzeeb

4 - Suhail bin tamam basri, Imran ul q'taan basri, Q'taada bin aama basri, Abu nazra manzer bin malik basri, Abu saeed khadri (rt)
Mohammad says Mahdi is from my progeny, he will fill the land with justice as it was filled with injustice and will rule 07 year.

5 - Mohd. bin musni basri, Muaaz bin hashaam basri, Qataada basri, Salah abu khaleel bin abi marryam basri, from his friend, (ummul mo'hmaineen) Umay salma (rt),
There would be disparity between ummat when one caliph die, and then one person will arrive from madina to makka, some persons from makka come and show off to others and he will dislike to it, persons will "bait" between "rukan and maqaam" there would be an army sent to them from "shaam" and will be penetrated in land, between makka & madina, when people saw him, the "abdaal" & "asa'aib" come to him from Shaam and make "bait". Then appear a man, his mother belong to "bani kalb", will send an army that will come out with flying color. This is the attack from bani kalb and sorrow for the person who could not get plunder (ghaneemat), every thing done as Sunnah, islam will spread on land. That person will rule 07 year and died.

6 - Haroon bin abdullah baghdadi, Abdul samad bin abdul waris basri, Hamaam bin yahyah bin dinar basri, Qataada basri, Abu khaleel bin abi marryam barsri, from his friend, (ummul mo'hmaineen) Umay salma (rt)

7 - Mohd. bin musna basri, Umro bin asim basri, Imran ul q'taan basri, Q'taada basri, Abu khaleen bin abi marryam basri, Abdullah bin haris, (ummul mo'hmaineen) Umay salma (rt),

8 - Usman bin abi sheeba koofi, Jareer bin abdul aziz bin rafi, Abaidullah bin qubtia, (ummul mo'hmaineen) Umay salma (rt),

(Hadith 6, 7 and 8 are same as 5, diff. the age is 09 year instead of 07 in 6 & 7 and hadith, and No. 8 have a little diff. in text)

9 - Haroon bin mugheera razi, Umero bin abi qais, Shoaib bin abi khalid, Abu ishaaq, Ali (rt)
Ali (rt) said hassan is "sardaar", soon a man will born in his progeny that will be Mohammad's namesake and in manners would be as same as of Mohammad, he will fill the land with justice.

10 - Haroon bin mugheera razi, Umero bin abi qais, Mutaraf bin zareef, Hassan, Hilaal bin umro, Ali (rt)
Ali (saw) said one man will come across this canal (which canal not known) his name is Haris or Haraas, there would be a man in his army named Mansoor will make better the environment for aal-a-mohammad just like "quraish" made the condition better for Mohammad. It is necessary for every Muslim to help him.

A brief description about "Ravees"

za'aid bin abi riqaad bahli
za'aid bin abi riqaad bahli was nothing, put wrong ahadith, lier.

Fater bin khalifa koofi
Ibn-a-hajar said Fater bin khalifa koofi was nothing, had bad concept of Deen, was keen shiya, leaved out, even abu dawood said he is Matrooh. Jozjani, imam ahmed, ibn-a-addi, daar qutni, ahmed bin younas did not like him.

Umer bin abaidullah kofi
umer bin abaidullah kofi was a third class Ravi.

Abu baker bin eyaash
Abdul rehman & yahya bin saeed did not like him, fond of gossip.

Suhail bin tamam basri
Ibn-a-hajar said suhail narrate Ahadith hallucinativelly,

Imran ul q'taan basri
About imran, Ibn-a-moeen said He is nothing & nisaee said "za'eef"

Q'taada bin aama basri
About Q'taada Hajar said He was "Mudallas"

Manzer bin malik
About Manzer bin malik Bukhari said he is nothing.

Mohd. bin musni basri
ibn-a-hajar said about musna he always change his book.

Muaaz bin hashaam basri
Muaaz is degraded by every one even Abu Dawood in spite of he got his hadith.

Salah abu khaleel bin abi marryam basri
About Ibn-a-marryam, Ibn-a-abdul ber said he is nothing.

Hamaam bin yahyah
ibn-a-hajar said hamaam bin yahyah is nothing.

(Tahzeeb ul Tahzeeb by Ibn-a-hajar)
Usman bin abi sheeba koofi
About Usman, Imam zehbi said in "tazkara tul haffaaz" and Ibn-a-hajar in "tahzeeb ul tahzeeb" he was changed the word of Quran and provide some examples, after examples zahbe says may he came back.


Abu ishaaq umro bin abdullah sabe'ee
Abu ishaaq umro bin abdullah sabe'ee was born in 33 hijri and Ali (rt) died in 40
hijri so it is impossible for Ishaaq that he got Ahadith from Ali (rt), hajar said in tahzeeb ul tahzeeb he narrate Ahadith from unknown persons, he called Ishaaq "mursal-a-hadith.

Hassan
No one know about Hassan, if he is Abul hassan (the sheikh of Mutaraf) then
his name is Attia bin saad bin janada af'wee jadlee qaisi koofi, every one
says about he is nothing, za'eef even Abu Dawood said he is not able to
trust over.

Hilaal bin umro
Hilaal - no one know about hilaal that who was he.

(Tahzeeb ul Tahzeeb by Ibn-a-hajar & May'zaan by Zahbee)


In Ibn-a-Maaja (07 Ahadith)

1 - Usman bin abi sheeba koofi, Mo'aavia bin hashaam koofi, Ali bin salah koofi, Yazeed bin abi ziyaad koofi, Ibrahim bin yazeed nahai'ee koofi, Alqama nahai'ee koofi, Abdullah bin masood (rt)
Ibn-a-masood says we were present, in between some more person belongs to "banu hasham" came to Mohammad. When Mohammad saw them His color of face changed. We asked what happened; Mohammad said Allah has chosen for us the eternal life against temporary. My ahl-a-bait will be overtaken by misery and degraded by every one, up till a nation will come from east with black flags they will demand for good but would not be fulfilled, and then they will fight; now they would be helped and given what they want but will not accept. They would be turned to a person from my ahl-a-bait and he will fill (whom? did not mention) with justice as the people fill with injustice. If some one gets them from you in touch with them even they travel on snow.

2 - Nasar bin ali jahzami basri, Mohammad bin marwaan aqeeli basri, Ammar bin abi hafsa basri, Zaid ul umi basri, Abu siddiq naji basri, Abu saeed khadri (rt)
There would be a mahdi in my ummat, will rule 5 or 7 year, people in his era will be very well settled and would not save for future, some one will come and say give me and mahdi will reply take it.

3 - Mohammad bin yahyah bin abi umro adni, Ahmed bin yousaf nesapuri, both are from Abdul razaq bin hamaam sanai, Sufiyaan soori, Khalid ul khuda basri, Abu qalaba abdullah bin zaid jarmi basri, Abu sama al rajee umro bin mursad damishqi shaami, Sobaan (mohammad's slave) (rt)
Mohammad (saw) said three man shell be murdered near your treasure, one will be the son of a caliph, now no one will get this treasure from them, then appear men with black flag from east side kill to you as you have not been killed before, (here sobaan says, Mohammad said some thing that I could not remember) afterward said when you see him make "Bait" even they travel on snow, because Mahdi is caliph from Allah.

4 - Usman bin abi sheeba koofi, Abu dawood khizermi koofi, Yaseen, Ibrahim bin mohammad bin hanfia, Mohammad bin hanfia, Ali (rt)
Ali (rt) said Mahdi will be from our Ahl-a-bait and Allah will make him able or suitable in one night.

5 - Abu bakar bin abi sheeba koofi, Ahmed bin abdul mulk khurani, Abu maleeh riqi, Ziyaad bin biyaan riqi, Ali bin nafeel abu mohammad jazri khurani, Saeed bin museeb, (ummul mo'hmaineen) Umay salma (rt),
saeed bin museeb said we were discussing about mahdi then Uma salma (rt) said I listened from Mohammad (saw) mahid will be progeny of fatima.

6 - Hadba bin abdul wahab, Saad bin abdul hameed bin jafer bin abdullah
baghdadi, Ali bin ziyaad yamaami basri, Akrama bin ammar yamaami basri,
Ashaaq bin abdullah abi talah, Ans bin malik (rt)
Mohammad (saw) said we are progeny of Abdul Mutalib. Me, Hamza, Ali, Jaffer, Hassan, Hussain and mahdi are the "Sardaar" of paridise.

7 - Hurmila bin yahyah misri, Ibrahim bin saeed tibri baghdadi, both are
from Abu salah abdul ghufaar bin dawood khurani, Abdullah bin lahe'ia misri,
Umro bin jaaber abu zar'aa khizerni misri, Abdullah bin haris ibn-a-juz'zabaidi, Mohammad (pbuh),
Mohammad (saw) says some men will come from east side and make the environment better for Mahdi's majesty and victory.

A brief description about "Ravees"

Ali bin salah koofi
Ali bin salah is unknown, he himself prepare ahadith.

Mo'aavia bin hashaam koofi
Hajar in tahzeeb - mo'aavia is nothing, za'eef, has been leave out.

yazeed bin abi ziyaad
yazeed bin abi ziyaad is keen "shiyaa" weak in memory, saeed alqa'taan says his hadith is nothing, Abdullah bin mubarik says his hadith is able to throw out on the wall, so and so. Imam wakiee says the hadith of flags is not right.

Mohammad bin marwaan aqeeli basri
Marwaan aqeeli - Imam Ahmed said he narrate some Ahadith in front of me but
that are not able to adopt, Abu Zaraa said he is nothing, zaid ul umi - every one says
he is nothing.

Abdul razaq bin hamaam
abdul razaq bin hamaam - shiyaa, Nasaee says narrate wrong Ahadith, Zaid bin mubarik says he is lier, Abbas al khairi says he is liar a step ahead from "waaqdi" (tahzeeb ul tahzeeb)

Abu dawood khizermi koofi
Imam zahbi says khizermi (named umer bin saad bin ubaid) was shiyaa but by
nature he was good

Yaseen (Yaseen bin mou'aaz alziyaat)
yahya bin moeen says his hadith is nothing, imam bukhari says he put wrong ahadith, imam nisai and ibn-a-junaid said he is leaved out, ibn-a-hab'baan says his hadith is like gossip. It is said that he could be yaseen bin shaibaan ajli koofi but Zahbee says he is yaseen bin muaaz al ziaat koofi

Abu bakar bin abi sheeba koofi
Abu bakar is the brother of usman bin abi sheeba and both are same, Ahmed
bin abdul mulk says "muhaddaseen" of his era did not like him.

Saad bin abdul hameed
saad bin abdul hameed was narrate wrong Ahadith.

Ali bin ziyaad yamaami
No one knows who was Ali bin ziyaad yamaami.

Akrama bin ammar yamaami basri
Hajar says he is nothing, Yahyah bin abi kaseer says narrate wrong Ahadith, Yahyah bin saeed says za'eef, (tahzeeb)

Abdullah bin lahe'ia misri
Every one degrades him.

Umro bin jaaber abu zar'aa khizerni misri
Imam Ahmed says he is liar even his pupil Abdullah bin lahe'ia says he was a
foolish "sheikh"

(Tahzeeb ul Tahzeeb by Ibn-a-hajar & May'zaan by Zahbee)


This concept inspired and encouraged many persons that it is the easy way to make something so Islamic history is the witness of number of Mahdies.

Few Name of famous Mahdi in history

Mugheera bin saeed ajlee, beheaded in 120 hijri.
Salah bin zareef, died in 224 hijri.
Ibn-a-saba beheaded by ali (rt)
Hamdaan bin alash'at qermata make mahdi in 225 hijri but disappear after few years.
Yahya bin mahdi, claimed as mahdi when Hamdaan disappeared, yahya deceived by abu saeed janabi qermati and retrieve.
Abu saeed janabi qermati make mahdi and after murder in 301 hijri his son abu tahir qermati make mahdi. Makkah is attacked by abu tahir in 317 hijri, he beheaded Muslims in whole city even in kaabah, and due to that person Muslims could not perform hajj for 10 year.(may'zaan by Zahbee)
Abu ali mansoor beheaded 411 hijri, siyuti says the land have not seen as cruel and injustice person as he was.
Hassan bin saba created "isma'eelia firqa" prince agha khan belongs to it.
Ghulam ahmed qadiaani birth 1840. Famous.

Mohammad bin Abdullah tomart hassni died 524 hijri, he was a very poise person, and his followers were very poise and he want to bring Muslims on the right way.
Mahdi sodani birth1848, mother name Amna and father name Abdullah, very poise, called Mahdi by his companions, doing struggle against English whole life.

Becoming of Imaam Mahdi looks as a sign of judgment day, but Quran says it's a hidden matter and there is not even a single sign that indicate that judgment day is near. It could be happened at any time, may after one minute or thousands of years.

The following will give a detailed explanation on how the Imam Mahdi prophecy found in some Hadith is infact a lie. If proven to be a lie, this would conclude that Mirza sahib's claim to be Imam Mahdi would also be a lie.

First of all we know very well that their is no mention or prophecy contained within the Quran which clearly portrays the coming of a Imam Mahdi.

Second, we also know that Hadith were compiled 200 years after the sad demise of our beloved prophet Mohammed (s). During the time period in which Hadith were being collected, we also know that many sects had already formed. These sects tried to influence their beleifs within the collected writings of Hadith. Let us provide evidence.

The following Hadith was narrated in Sahih-Muslim, one of the most authentic collections of Hadith. The narration is of the popular Farewell Khutba given by the prophet Mohammed (s) before his sad demise.

"I leave with you Quran and Ahlul Bayt, if you follow these two, you will never go astray."

(Sahih Muslim 44, Number 2408; Ibn Hanbal 4/366; Darimi, Number 3319.)

Sunnis including Ahmadis always portray the Hadith which would read otherwise

"I leave with you the Quran and my Sunnah, if you follow these two, you will never go astray"

Now clearly with reading the words Ahlul Bayt (People of the House), one would easily find Shia influence on this Hadith, knowing that Shia believe in the high status of the Ahlul Bayt; OR one is ready to accept that that the last sermon did indeed want us to follow the Ahlul Bayt and not the Sunnah, which would then conclude that the Shia are right, and MGA's claim must have been false regardless because MGA denied the imammah of the Ahlul Bayt and Shia regime.

I will provide more evidence on how other sects, and specifically the Shia had influence on the narrations and collections of Sunni Hadith, but before I do so, we must understand the idea of Imam Mahdi.

We already know that the Mahdi prophecy is no where to be found in the Quran, thus the promise from Allah (swt) Himself does not exist. Whats more interesting is that Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim too rejected the idea about the coming of an Imam Mahdi, as there is no Hadith found in any of these books about the coming of an Imam Mahdi, and these two books are considered to be the two most authentic books of Hadith. Even the Lahori Ahmadi website confirms:

"The reports about Messiah have been accepted by all the great authorities of Hadith, whereas the reports relating to Mahdi have been rejected not only by Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, but also by many eminent scholars of Hadith. There is no doubt that all these reports have been greatly tampered with for various reasons, so much so, that even those who believe in the coming of Mahdi only accept the fundamental fact of his advent."

www.aaiil.org/text/books/...ahdi.shtml

The Lahori Ahmadi party clearly admits to the weakness in these Hadith concerning Imam Mahdi, and yet wants to create excuses that "there must have been a reason" why both parties agreed to some extent why this person would come. Yet, in reality the only reason the Sunnis believe in the coming of the Imam Mahdi is because of the narrations given in some unauthentic Sunni Hadith. Yet the Sunnis do not realize that such Hadith were influenced by the Shia party. Here is some proof.

Ahmadis know very well the prophecy contained in Dar-Qutni about the two sets of eclipses that would take place. The facts however about this Hadith are not recognized by Ahmadis!

"Imam Ali bin Umar Dar-e-Qutni states in his collection: My Ustaad Abu Saeed Istakhri narrates from his Ustaad Muhammad bin Abdullah, who narrates from his Ustaad Ubaid bin Yaeesh, and he narrates from Yunus bin Bukair, and he from Amar bin Shamir, and he from Jaabir who narrates that Muhammad bin Ali said."

Now first and foremost, the chain of narration concludes that this is a statement of Muhammad bin Ali and not of prophet Mohammed (s)! It should be noted that Muhammad bin Ali is the great-grandson of Imam Ali (ra), and thus the statement comes from Muhammad bin Ali who belonged to the ahlul bayt and honored by the Shia regime.

Furthermore it is also narrated by Amar bin Shamir who comes as one of the beginners in the chain of narrations. Who is Amar bin Shamir?

Quote:
Allama Zhahabi, a great authority on hadith has the following entry in his famous critique, Meezaanul I'tidaal:
Amar bin Shamir: A Shia from Kufa. This man is a Shia who insults the Sahaba, and fabricates narrations in the name of authentic Ulema. Imam Bukhari says: His narrations are rejected. Yahya says: His narrations should not be recorded. Suleimani says: This Amar used to fabricate narrations for the Shias. Imam Nasaai says: His narrations have been discarded. (Meezaanul I'tidaal vol. P.268)

Allama Ibni Hajar quotes the following in his work, Lisaanul Meezaan: Ibni Abi Haatim says: I asked my father(Abu Haatim) about him (Amar bin Shamir), and he replied: His ahadeeth are totally rejected, a weak narrator, a person one should never get involved with. The Muhadditheen have forsaken him. Abu Abdullah Haakim (a high ranking authority on hadith) states: He has many fabrications narrated from Jabir Ju?afi, and no-one else besides him (Amar bin Shamir) narrate these blatant fabrications from Jabir. (Lisaanul Meezaan vol. P. 367)

Infact Imam Dar Qutni HIMSELF deemed Jaabir and Amar bin Shamir as unreliable ! "Both are unreliable narrators. Their narrations are not admissible as proof to substantiate any claim." (Dare Qutni vol.2 p.65)

References: www.central-mosque.com/fiqh/mahdi.htm

Clearly we reach two conclusions from this evidence. One, that the narrators are Shia, and two that as Shia they specifically awaited the return of their 12th Imam, Imam Muhammad Mehdi.

See Websites: www.shia.org/mehdi.htmlht...mehdi.html : www.imammehdi.org

We know that the Shia regime follow what they know as the 12 Imams of the Ahlul Bayt. Imam Muhammed Mehdi was the son of the 11th Imam, Imam Hasan Askari. Apparently the very young Imam Mehdi disappeared and was said by the Shia to return at the end of times along with Isa.

No Sunni Muslim believed in the coming of Imam Mehdi but until the narrations were compiled. The collections were infact compiled after the so called disappearence of Imam Mehdi. Here are the descriptions of the Imam Mehdi as narrated in Tirmidhi:

1. Mahdi is going to come in the last days to make a universal Government,
2. Mahdi is from the Ahlul-Bayt of Prophet,
3. Mahdi is from the children of Fatimah (AS), the daughter of Prophet,
4. Mahdi is different than Jesus (the messiah),
5. Jesus will be one of the followers of Imam Mahdi and prays behind him.

The last one in particular seems to be controversial simply because the Shia believe that the 12 Imams were superior to all Israelite prophets, and equal in status to prophet Mohammed (s). To say that Jesus would pray behind Mehdi is blasphemy in itself.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad does not fulfill much of any of the Imam Mahdi prophecies! Including:

The Messenger of Allah said: "Al-Mahdi is one of the children of Fatimah (the Prophet's daughter)."

(Sunni reference: Sunan Ibn Majah, V2, Tradition #4086)

"The Messenger of Allah said: "The world will not perish until a man among the A appears whose name matches my name."

(Sunni reference: Sahih Tirmidhi, V9, P74)

MGA is claimed to be persian and indian, NOT ARAB.

"All looked towards his son Hasan and said: A person will be born from his seed whose name will be the name of your Prophet and he will resemble him in disposition but not in outward form." [Sunan Abu Dawud, p. 241].

MGA was not a son of Fatimah or Hasan. MGA is not from among the ahlul bayt!

There are many more Hadith similar to this which have nothing to do with MGA and his claims. Maybe MGA should have studied the facts before making his claim!

Conclusion: The entire concept of Imam Mahdi is derived from the Shia regime who believed in the coming of this individual. The Shia helped to insert such beleifs within the writings of Sunni Hadith.

No comments:

Post a Comment